Last week, one of our chapters was titled 출산율이 떨어지고 있어요 (The Birth Rate is Decreasing). I've read about South Korea's birth rate and how it is decreasing at a dangerous rate. It's a big enough problem that the Korean government is launching a campaign to raise the birth rate and one of the ways it's doing this (other than by cutting work hours to increase the birth rate) is by creating propaganda. This is all information that I already knew about. What I did not know is that the Korean government has a long history of using propaganda to encourage/discourage Koreans from having children. Here's a brief summary of what we learned in class:
1960s (birth rate = 5+ children per family)
많이낳아 고생말고 적게낳아 잘키우자 (Instead of having lots of kids and suffering, let's have few and raise them well)
This was after the Korean War when Korea was still a poor nation. It was not possible for most families to feed 5 children. Also, it was really important for families to have at least one son in the family to continue that family's name. Since women technically "left" their birth family when they got married, only sons could continue the family name. Thus, families would keep having children until they gave birth to a son. This practice combined with the poverty of post-war Korea meant that there were many many starving daughters in Korea.
1970s (birth rate = 2.65 - 4.1 children per family)
딸/아들 구별말고 둘만낳아 잘기르자 (Don't discriminate between daughters and sons. Let's just have two kids and raise them well.)
The government was still trying to lower the birth rate and went as far as to designate the ideal number of kids. It also wanted to put an end to the practice of having daughter after daughter until a son was born. My teacher says that during this time, if you had more than 2 kids people thought you were 무식해 (ignorant). People would ask "how many kids do you have?" and they would get embarrassed and respond "oh, we have kind of a large family..." The wealthiest, most educated families would only have one or two children.
1980s - 1990s (birth rate = 1.59 - 2.83 children per family)
둘도 많다! (Even two is too much!)
지구가 두개라면 해결될까요 (Would [the problem] be solved in there were two Earths?)
Self-explanatory.
present (birth rate = 1.15 - 1.17 children per family)
엄마! 아빠! 혼자는 싫어요... (Mom! Dad! I don't like being alone...)
하나의 촛불보다는 여러 개의 촛불이 더 밝습니다 (Many candle lights are brighter than one candle light)
Now the birth rate is too low and from what I understand, people blame it mainly on two things: 1.) the high cost of education and 2.) the increasing number of 맛벌이 부부s (couples where both the husband and wife work) and DINKS (double income, no kids = married couples that have no kids).
The first reason is the main problem. Starting as early as elementary school children get supplemental education after school. Whereas American kids might be learning how to play an instrument or playing sports, Korean students are studying English, math, English, art, English, etc. It is a huge financial burden for parents and one of the most-cited reasons for not having more kids is that a couple cannot afford to pay for another child's education costs. It's to the point where families with 3+ kids are assumed to be wealthy (and they're right most of the time) because that means that a family is able to afford 3 childrens' education costs. Also, if people find out you have more than 2 kids in your family, they will say that you have a lot of Korean pride or are "doing a great service for the nation." I wish I could remember how my teacher phrased that in class because I actually laughed out loud. But I guess it's a big enough problem that 2+ kids = service to your country.
The second reason is a relatively new phenomenon since women have only been working for a few decades now. The DINKS (yes, this is a real word people use in Korea and my teacher said it and looked at me as if she expected me to explain what it was since it was in English, but obviously I had no idea what that meant) are a rare breed of 맛벌이 부부s that both work but don't have kids, usually because they'd rather just enjoy life than share their income with a third person. Personally, I don't understand how two people could think this way. But hey, to each his own ... I guess.
Anyway, I hope that was informative and the tiniest bit interesting. To be honest, my entire class fell asleep during this lesson. I, on the other hand, thought it was so cool how in learning about the history of the birth rate of Korea I was able to learn so much more about Korea's changing social norms and how the implications of children have changed throughout the years. Either that, or I just really like babies.
share on: facebook